President Mahama has benefitted from both Kissi Agyebeng and Dominic Ayine’s unethical and unprofessional conduct and cannot dispense with either of them no matter what evidence is put before him. The tension shall, therefore, continue despite the judgement of the supreme Court in Adamtey v Attorney-General as we saw from the spokesmen from the two institutions. The long game the Mahama government is playing with the constitutionality of the OSP and its reset agenda resembles the butcher who fears the knife syndrome preventive mentality. Time will tell!

This dialogue demonstrates with solid facts and evidence that President Mahama’s attempts to intimidate and silence me using public appointees and surrogates in the Asante Kwaku Berko-AKSA-Ghana Bribery deal discourse to cover-up the massive corruption will fail and has failed.

The conviction of Asante Kwaku Berko by the United States District Court Eastern District of New York on 6 August 2026 came as a surprise to the Mahama government which is now engaged in damage control using lies, fabrications, and propaganda to evade accountability. The Statement of the OSP at its media conference on 26 August 2026 at which the Special Prosecutor state inter alia that: “....We have been actively and carefully investigating the Ghanaian dimension....” is a barefaced lie being told by the government to swindle the public about an intention to kill any investigations into the AKSA-Ghana bribery deal.

A President elected to office under the auspices of the NDC automatically becomes the leader of the party but that does not give the President the authority to usurp the functions of the duly elected executive officers of the NDC. President Mahama and his handlers in the Jubilee House, therefore, have an obligation to explain to the public their reasons for nominating James Agalga in writing to the Speaker as Acting Majority Leader when he had no power under the Constitution to do so as President of Ghana.

EOCO as presently constituted and controlled by the Attorney-General is the worse vehicle for impartial apolitical investigation and prosecution of the Asante Berko-Aksa-Ghana bribery deal whether for corruption or money laundry. EOCO under its present leadership has been weaponized as the Ghanaian Gestapo for hunting down perceived adversaries through the process of criminal justice administration and protecting the government’s own appointees and supporters from prosecution. The evidence will be suppressed!

With the investigative tools and other tradecraft available to the GoG, a completed investigation docket must have been ready by the OSP for prosecution or other law enforcement agencies investigating other criminal aspects of the Asante Berko-AKSA-Ghana Bribery deal before the NDC won the 7 December 2024 elections. This case mysteriously disappeared from cases under investigation by the OSP and is not listed on its website today. President Mahama must, therefore, tell us what happened to the OSP investigation into the AKSA-Ghana bribery deal.

The purpose of this discourse is, therefore, to caution the public to hold their horses and refrain from speculating on what the Supreme Court decided in Adamtey v Attorney-General until the certified judgment becomes publicly available. Only then can there be an informed discourse on whether the Court really decided that Act 959 is constitutional in its entirety or found portions of it to be unconstitutional, and the reason for the unconstitutionality.  

The interview of Mr. Kenneth Kuranchie on Joy News’ PM Express with Evan Mensah to dispel the credible perception that he brought the action as a camouflage to “seeking a third term for President Mahama” is a hard sell by him as I have demonstrated in this discourse. His action solicits the Supreme Court to usurp the expression of the will of the people at a national referendum with the substitution of a judicial decision contrary to the clear dictates of the 1992 Constitution. We the People can never be deceived by subterfuges!

The continued political witch-hunt against Ken Ofori-Atta by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) and the Government of Ghana through sections of the rented Ghanaian media any time he prevailed in defending his rights under the INTERPOL and the US Immigration laws is nauseating and shameful.

The public is entitled to know the reasons Ms. Justice Akuffo assigned for her resignation to enable us to determine what the government had done to warrant the unprecedented step of a former Chief Justice resigning from the Council of State in the history of the 1992 Constitution. The Government also owes the people of Ghana an explanation for the delay in disclosing and informing the public of the tendering of her resignation.

Every election the NDC has won under the 1992 Constitution has consistently been based on promises to the electorate to implement policies anchored on the core values of probity, accountability, transparency, and social justice underpinning the 4 June 1979 Revolution and Constitution of the NDC: the 1992, 1996, 2008, 2012, and 2024 elections speak for themselves. The NDC’s ability to win the 2028 elections will depend on how the electorate perceives the party’s commitment to these values. It is too early for sycophancy, gloating, and flaunting of awards about successes when one remembers the adulations of the early years of the Akufo-Addo government.

Mr. Justice John Eugene Nyante Nyadu of the High Court, Accra, on 9 March 2026, when the parties appeared before him in the quo warranto application, adjourned the proceedings sine die. The public needs transparent and accountable answers because a Court that adjourns the hearing of a case sine die cannot reconvene out of the blue and create a situation where an already written substantive ruling is delivered by the Judge in the case the same day.

I feel very strongly that when an Interested Party or Parties join the case of Adamtey v the Attorney-General pending before the Supreme Court for determination and canvass the alternative perspective submitted in this discourse, the Supreme Court may come to the conclusion and decide that the Special Prosecutor has prosecutorial powers under Act 959 and L. I. 2374, particularly under Regulation 11 thereof.

I have firstly come to the considered conclusion that the originating notice of motion (the application for quo warranto) before the High Court which purported to begin the action did not disclose any locus standi and/or capacity in the Applicant against the Respondent to have grounded jurisdiction in the High Court to have entertained the application under Order 55 Rule 1(a) and (b), and Rule 2 (1) (b) of C. I. 47.

The US Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the independent counsel provisions of the Ethics in Government Act. 1978 in Morrison v Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988) and the Supreme Court of Ghana may be similarly persuaded that the Special Prosecutor who cannot be appointed by the President without being first nominated by the Attorney-General under Act 959 is thereby clothed with prosecutorial authority for the appointed tenure of seven years.  

Insultingly, as though he was not speaking to the very electorate who made him President, President Mahama had the effrontery to flaunt before Ghanaians the unlawful acquisition of acres of land for cocoa farming in abuse of office under Articles 68 and 284 of the 1992 Constitution as an excuse for the indigent cocoa farmer to accept the government’s breaches of trust on the agreed producer price for the 2025/2026 season.

The objective truth vindicating me on the failure of the Asantehene’s Bawku Mediation came out of the President’s own mouth to the Chiefs of the Upper East Regional House of Chiefs on 10 February 2026 and is available on the electronic media that mediators whether traditional or whatever form of mediation cannot usurp the functions of arbitrators or adjudicators in making decisions binding on the parties to the mediation process. The law is the law!

Concerning the unlawful arrest and detention of Alhaji Abagre by the GAF from Bawku to Accra, where he is in the unlawful custody of the National Intelligence Bureau (NIB) who had to take steps to regularize his unconstitutional and unlawful abduction by moving the Circuit Court, Adenta on 26 December 2025 “praying for a detention order of the Accused Seidu Abagre@Naa Sheriga Kulga II pending investigations, upon the grounds contained in the supporting affidavit.”

President Mahama could have enforced the law on the existence of only one recognized Bawku-Naba as Overlord of the Bawku Traditional Area without enhancing the status of Alhaji Seidu Abagre “as a rival Bawku-Naaba for the Mamprusi people” as no such status is known to the law. The only lasting solution to the Bawku Affairs is to enforce the existing law in strict compliance with the 1992 Constitution and the laws of Ghana without reference to electoral political objectives. 

I believe that no court would have ordered his continued detention merely because he shared any of my articles before and after the Bawku Mediation Report was presented to the public at the Jubilee House on 16 December 2025. It is, therefore, mischievous for any person or group of persons who published the press release in the name of the Nayiri to have referred to any of my articles as the reason for his arrest whilst I walk free.