TIMING OF DEBATE ABOUT UNFAIRNESS OF REMOVAL PROVISION OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE INTERFERES WITH PENDING PETITIONS
Every citizen is enjoined to abide by the decision of the Supreme Court and it is, therefore, impermissible to seek to influence the removal process of the Chief Justice by publishing unauthenticated content of alleged petitions or for a member of the Council of State or for any other so called eminent persons to mount public platforms at the CRC to tacitly bargain into the hearing of the petitions by the committee appointed to do so.
CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BEING USED AS COVERT PROPAGANDA INSTRUMENT AGAINST COUNCIL OF STATE
The timing of the IEA facilitation process for the constitutional review process and the intervention of the CRC Chairman, Mr. Kwasi Prempeh, who is also the Executive Director of CDD-Ghana who held public office in the Akufo-Addo government when the Council of State has come under partisan criticism within the past two months in the execution of its mandate under Article 146(6) of the Constitution for the removal of Chief Justices gives one the impression that the IEA forum is being used for ideological partisan politics once again.